> You only have to look at the multitude of society that have survived until now to see that that kind of thought is not valid Thinking longer term, it could a

> You only have to look at the multitude of society that have survived until now to see that that kind of thought is not valid Thinking longer term, it could also be that not enough time has elapsed or that there was/is too little social interaction between all players for one dominant behavior to emerge. It might also be that there is no one dominant emergent behavior, but several, all contributing to the overarching goal of survival (think Nash equilibrium).