4 ms·
You could reduce some of the downsides by reducing the amount required for bail by day and by adding limits for how long someone could be required to stay. Als
by harha 6y ago
You could reduce some of the downsides by reducing the amount required for bail by day and by adding limits for how long someone could be required to stay.
Also an automated system to calculate bail and maximum duration (as in not the judge deciding) might reduce some bias, so some categories of potential crimes don’t end up in jail while awaiting trial unless it’s a repeated offense.
Another approach could be to account for the pre trial days more favorably for the defendant: x days pre trial count for 2x days if convicted or need to get reimbursed at the higher of minimum rate or more than the loss of income. This approach would require a way to make sure judges don’t collude though.
- bawolff 6y ago> You could reduce some of the downsides by reducing the amount required for bail by day and by adding limits for how long someone could be required to stay Either the amount is sufficient to prevent the accused from hopping on a plane to Bali, or it isn't. If a lesser amount would have sufficied than that should have been the amount in the first place. Bail isn't meant as a punishment, its meant as a way to ensure you don't leave town. If you could just wait it out, everyone who wanted to run would just wait it out, and you would end up bssically creating a system that just hinders "good" people while not serving its purpose of preventing people from skipping out.