10 ms·
I talked about this at length with a retired quant back when the news about HFT shops first went around. The basic view is that HFT increases liquidity, which
by jasonwatkinspdx 6y ago
I talked about this at length with a retired quant back when the news about HFT shops first went around.
The basic view is that HFT increases liquidity, which in the abstract should help everyone.
My friend's view was, first, that privileged access, special order types, etc, were so egregiously wrong it need not be discussed further. Second they found the liquidity argument weak, and in general believed that signals on such short timescales were often more harmful than beneficial.
They preferred a solution similar to yours, quantizing the markets by time and having one formally specified "fair playout" algorithm within the quanta. Pick the quanta such that it makes global communication time irrelevant (ie a few seconds). There's some subtleties to it but they considered the idea both workable and superior to what we have now.
I have to be somewhat circumspect for privacy, but this person was quite successful at stat arb, and in a previous life very successful at finding zero days in kernel code. I generally believe they know what they're talking about in great depth on the topic. They're exactly who'd be near the top of your list of prospects if you wanted to set up a HFT shop.
- dcl 6y agoSo according to this person, this event never happened and absolutely does not continue to happen? https://www.reuters.com/article/sec-bats-settlement-idUSL1N0UR1KN20150112 https://www.reuters.com/article/sec-bats-settlement-idUSL1N0...
- jasonwatkinspdx 6y ago"My friend's view was, first, that privileged access, ... were so egregiously wrong it need not be discussed further." Can you dial down the snark and explain what argument you're making that doesn't fall under the above?
- dcl 6y agoMy apologies. To me, it seemed that labelling the ideas of privileged access and secret order types to be so egregiously wrong and not worthy of discussion a bit dismissive when there has been evidence that these sort of activies have occured before.
- jasonwatkinspdx 6y agoFair enough. What my wording meant is that there's no point in discussing them in the debate sense. They just shouldn't exist. Period. The liquidity argument is more complex and debatable.
- dcl 6y agoAhh got ya.