[1] As it happens Google advertising Chrome on Google websites seems fairly reasonable to me, but anyway. This is the very definition of monopoly abuse: Using

[1] As it happens Google advertising Chrome on Google websites seems fairly reasonable to me, but anyway. This is the very definition of monopoly abuse: Using your monopoly in one market (search) to push into another market (browsers). Exactly what got Microsoft in trouble in the 90s... and looking at firefox marketshare, it's having exactly the same results.