4 ms·
Only, not. The author never sets up any dichotomy at all, nor does he suggest the elimination of renewables. He merely suggests that nuclear have a higher prior
by Bud 6y ago
Only, not. The author never sets up any dichotomy at all, nor does he suggest the elimination of renewables. He merely suggests that nuclear have a higher priority, for reasons he then goes on to explain:
"That is why any climate plan that doesn’t prioritize nuclear above all other energy sources is destined to exacerbate climate problems rather than solve them. "
- sebmellen 6y agoIf only the author didn't use such an inflammatory title. Why don't we need a Green New Deal (+ Nuclear)? A "Nuclear New Deal" is a myopic approach to a systems wide catastrophe which includes pollution, waste, emissions, food production, energy production, supply chains, etc. and more.