4 ms·
I’ve had a 240hz monitor for a while now and I wouldn’t say 144hz is a waste. I do agree 100-120hz is the sweet spot, good balance of refresh rate and graphica
by nichch 6y ago
I’ve had a 240hz monitor for a while now and I wouldn’t say 144hz is a waste.
I do agree 100-120hz is the sweet spot, good balance of refresh rate and graphical quality.
I would not suggest a 240hz monitor if you are not playing competitive shooters a majority of the time.
- ardit33 6y agoI agree. By 'a waste', I didn't mean that it is not better, but I meant that it is a diminishing returns curve, and you will end up sacrificing a lot to achieve it (resolution and graphical quality, as computing is not free) and it doesn't feel that much better. Going from 60HZ to 120, or even 90HZ is very noticeable by everyone, even in normal 2D content. Past 120 it is like, eh, just a bit better. Between 120HZ 4k, and 240HZ HD, I'd take the 120HZ 4k Between 120HZ 4k, and 90HZ 4k but with fully Ray Casting, I'd take the 90HZ (unless it is a competitive FPS) etc...
- fomine3 6y agoBlurBusters argues even 1000Hz worth, interesting. https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-future-1000hz-displays-with-blurfree-sample-and-hold/ https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-...