If we're going to do nuclear there are better arguments needed. This is not an honest evaluation > nuclear waste isn’t a glowing toxic ooze That's irrelevant,

If we're going to do nuclear there are better arguments needed. This is not an honest evaluation > nuclear waste isn’t a glowing toxic ooze That's irrelevant, whether true or false waste has to be handled. So far it's not been done well, and language like that is appeal to emotion, not facts. The comment of 300 times waste from solar panels than nuclear doesn't reflect the different waste types. I'm not actually against nuclear intrinsically but pieces like this are not honest nor therefore, useless.