4 ms·
We must have to assume the developers registered the domain for the client and it was in their name and the client had no way of actually proving that the domai
by dpcan 16y ago
We must have to assume the developers registered the domain for the client and it was in their name and the client had no way of actually proving that the domain belonged to them - probably because it was an obscure name, and not the name of their company.
- magic_haze 16y agoSo, essentially, incompetence mixed with blackmail. Can't really blame technology for that. (edit: I think there's a big part of the story we're missing here. Seriously, what company that claims to be a "new and promising internet business" outsources its engineering?)