3 ms·
Is there an independent reference for this? In my experience, checklists almost always silently fail. [Edited to add: 2015 column in Nature suggests studies g
by learnstats2 6y ago
Is there an independent reference for this?
In my experience, checklists almost always silently fail.
[Edited to add: 2015 column in Nature suggests studies giving positive results to checklists don't replicate:
https://www.nature.com/news/hospital-checklists-are-meant-to-save-lives-so-why-do-they-often-fail-1.18057 https://www.nature.com/news/hospital-checklists-are-meant-to... ]
- JumpCrisscross 6y ago> column in Nature suggests studies giving positive results to checklists don't replicate "In a review of nearly 7,000 surgical procedures performed at 5 NHS hospitals, they found that the checklist was used in 97% of cases, but was completed only 62% of the time8. When the researchers watched a smaller number of procedures in person, they found that practitioners often failed to give the checks their full attention, and read only two-thirds of the items out loud9. In slightly more than 40% of cases, at least one team member was absent during the checks; 10% of the time, the lead surgeon was missing."
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- learnstats2 6y agoYes, exactly... 64% of the time, in well-sampled professional surgical settings, the checklist was not even completed?
- galphanet 6y agoTry saying/doing that in the airplane industry. Pilots are trained to use the checklist in all operations.