4 ms·
Thanks for explaining some more. So it's basically an attempt to standardize group naming, to address a fairly specific use case (as with my previous comments,
by pmachinery 6y ago
Thanks for explaining some more. So it's basically an attempt to standardize group naming, to address a fairly specific use case (as with my previous comments, that's not a criticism, just how I'm trying to understand it) of someone not wanting messages from different servers in a particular group?
This goes against how Usenet works in general, allowing people from different servers to have discussions with each other, but I can see how it's useful in some cases, for server specific groups.