Even though they raise some interesting points, there's also a lot of assumptions that don't seem to be backed up by the actual day-glo text For example the an

Even though they raise some interesting points, there's also a lot of assumptions that don't seem to be backed up by the actual day-glo text For example the analysis says that they're a bunch of idiots driving around shooting shit because they have no leadership or hierarchy. Then you read the citation, and it's about how one of the terrorists didn't shoot because he asked for permission and was denied