3 ms·
> This HAS to apply equally No, it really doesn't. IMO it has to apply consistently. And it's easy to maintain cohesion / consistency here: If you have differe
by RangerScience 6y ago
> This HAS to apply equally
No, it really doesn't. IMO it has to apply consistently. And it's easy to maintain cohesion / consistency here: If you have different rights, you get different rights.
Police have additional rights, particularly when acting in the course of their jobs - specifically, they have the right of violence. Seems reasonable to give up the "right" of protection-from-griefing.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> Police have additional rights No, police exercise and are protected by powers of government, these are not the same kind of thing as rights, and do not belong to the individual the way rights do. Moreover, the legitimacy of such powers is exactly dependent on the legitimacy of the government and the extent to which it observes the rights of the people subject to it's powers.
- RangerScience 6y agoDuck-typing, to my eyes; particularly when looking at doxxing, TOS, and overall morality/ethics. Sure. Not "rights" in a legal sense, but...
- thatjamesdude 6y agoIs there a difference between equal and consistent application? I agree, but it seems we're saying the same thing?