4 ms·
So Apple is now in charge of deciding whether elections are legitimate? It's weird how people in this thread are zigzagging between saying Apple has too much c
by qPM9l3XJrF 6y ago
So Apple is now in charge of deciding whether elections are legitimate?
It's weird how people in this thread are zigzagging between saying Apple has too much corporate power and Apple needs much more.
Does every country in the world really have to be a democracy? Remember how the Arab Spring turned out?
- foepys 6y ago> So Apple is now in charge of deciding whether elections are legitimate? Don't worry, Apple doesn't have to decide anything here. The US government already did.
- dane-pgp 6y agoI'm not sure why this is being downvoted, but perhaps people don't believe the claim that the US government has formally taken a side on the legitimacy of the elections: https://www.axios.com/us-lukashenko-president-belarus-353ed235-98f7-446f-919a-6a6cdab81975.html https://www.axios.com/us-lukashenko-president-belarus-353ed2... It seems to me that this offers a clever way out for Apple: If Lukashenko isn't the legitimate president of Belarus, then the "police" following his orders to attack protesters are not police at all, but terrorists; and Telegram is helping to bring them to the attention of the legitimate authorities of the president in exile.
- mswtk 6y ago> Does every country in the world really have to be a democracy? They don't. Does every country in the world really need to have racial equality and an even-handed police force? They don't either.