4 ms·
Moore's law for performance has been dead for 15 years. No one's noticed though.
by konjin 6y ago
Moore's law for performance has been dead for 15 years. No one's noticed though.
- dTal 6y agoThere is no "Moore's law for performance". Moore's law is a statement about the number of transistors on a chip, nothing more (Moore?). And sure enough, the Threadripper machine I built this year has about double the number of transistors as the Threadripper machine I built last year, which has about double the number of transistors to the one before that... (although this is partly a function of increasing budget; Moore's law specifies a two year doubling). But sure, if you want to talk performance - the fastest CPU this year, the Threadripper 3990X, is over 100x faster than the fastest CPU of 2005, the Athlon 64 FX-57. That's about 7-8 doublings, or pretty much spot on.
- mcguire 6y agoFaster how, exactly? The clock rate is ~4/3. It has 128 half-cores, but the benefits will depend on the workload. :-)
- konjin 6y agoFor a very long time between 1970 and 2005 doubling the transistors halved the time taken for any task. We're well past this point. If you don't think so try and calculate a_{i+1} = rand_int() a_i mod 232 on a machine from today and one from 2005. Then do the same with a machine from 2005 and 1990.