3 ms·
Take it another way: would you prevent your boys from having one more erotogenous zone to explore on their partner when they are adult just so that you could ex
by bitL 6y ago
Take it another way: would you prevent your boys from having one more erotogenous zone to explore on their partner when they are adult just so that you could explore it everywhere now? Would you be so selfish to be able to experience it now but prevent your kids from ever experiencing it?
- cblconfederate 6y agoSorry that’s one of the most ridiculous arguments for oppressing everyone, and partially applied. Why not cover men’s nipples too?
- bitL 6y agoWe should cover sports cars, those make females excited. Not male nipples.
- cblconfederate 6y agoand six-packs
- bitL 6y ago...but only if they are of Magic Mike size, larger ones are repulsive (I was told).
- saagarjha 6y agoThere are people that fetishize feet, so I’m not sure your argument can even be supported even if it wasn’t such a strange reach.
- bitL 6y ago...and balloons. I was surprised to learn that having a bunch of balloons next to models is a fetish to some as well.
- cblconfederate 6y agoI 'm pretty sure the universe of fetishes is infinite and probably expanding. I wonder if there's research on that.
- Broken_Hippo 6y agoSo, perhaps we should cover ears, necks, and lips too? Backs too, can't forget that. No sandals. Don't forget men, too: They really need to cover up more. Especially their nipples. Beaches are going to be a real bummer and more uncomfortable. Perhaps we should require loose swimwear and increase risk of drowning while we are at it. Nudity isn't going to take away any of these zones. You children are going to experience things differently than you, and nudity isn't going to encourage or prevent it.