no because when read he comes across as someone who isn't great at grasping the full details because they are too busy with their own preconceived notions. "not

no because when read he comes across as someone who isn't great at grasping the full details because they are too busy with their own preconceived notions. "not a details person", or whatever. he has always been pretty good at preach-to-the-choir-style writing, which genuinely has its uses, it's just that you have to squint before drawing firm conclusions about the subject matter. which is the absolute opposite of levine. but hey, that's just, like, my opinion, man. to each, their own.