3 ms·
I think 130 times recommended. Or perhaps only 30 times what should be recommend. It's thought the old recommended dose is to low for some people or some situa
by aaron695 6y ago
I think 130 times recommended. Or perhaps only 30 times what should be recommend.
It's thought the old recommended dose is to low for some people or some situations. Which is why they really want to push it up as much as possible for all because it will save lives.
Hence these studies. I'm doing 1000UI daily given current data and covid-19.
- arkitaip 6y agoI seriously doubt this was a scientific study to test the upper tolerance limits of vit D. I mean, no ethics committee on the planet would approve the dosage.
- phobosanomaly 6y agoI was hoping to see an animal model, or on an in-vitro model: Bao YW, Yuan Y, Chen JH, Lin WQ. Kidney disease models: tools to identify mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Zool Res. 2018;39(2):72-86. doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2017.055 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5885387/ Nishinakamura, R. Human kidney organoids: progress and remaining challenges. Nat Rev Nephrol 15, 613–624 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0176-x https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0176-x https://www.nature.com/articles/s41581-019-0176-x#citeas https://www.nature.com/articles/s41581-019-0176-x#citeas With a nice, simple graph showing effects of Vitamin D levels on kidney function over time.