3 ms·

That's not really true unfortunately, there's a good amount of videos that proves the contrary. It also does make sense to come protected when the police use da

by boudin 6y ago

That's not really true unfortunately, there's a good amount of videos that proves the contrary. It also does make sense to come protected when the police use dangerous weapons and violent strategies against protests.

barumi 6y ago
> That's not really true unfortunately, there's a good amount of videos that proves the contrary. Are you referring to any of the exquisitely cherry picked videos that were highly edited to convey the militants talking points? Better yet, are you able to provide a single example that supports your assertion? > It also does make sense to come protected when the police use dangerous weapons and violent strategies against protests. That assertion makes absolutely no sense in france, specially as you're referring to one-off protests where activists plan to riot and assault people and destroy property.
- boudin 6y ago
  https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_polici%C3%A8re_en_France https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_polici%C3%A8re_en_F... There is plenty of journalist who did a good job to report violence also. You can look for articles in 2018 and 2019 mainly. > That assertion makes absolutely no sense in france, specially as you're referring to one-off protests where activists plan to riot and assault people and destroy property. You don't know much about what has been happening in France apparently. I'm not talking about the actions of far-right parties to discredit protests or the few people that joins protests just for the fight but people who are protesting in the first place.
raverbashing 6y ago
Good luck trying to convince anyone with such a crap argument. At this point I cannot distinguish the GJ from a crying kid on a plane that's crying just because and the more they scream the more it hurts their throat making them scream more. The protestors are exposing themselves to be the chair à canon of political movements (which might or might not have ulterior motives)

by boudin 6y ago

barumi 6y ago

> That's not really true unfortunately, there's a good amount of videos that proves the contrary. Are you referring to any of the exquisitely cherry picked videos that were highly edited to convey the militants talking points? Better yet, are you able to provide a single example that supports your assertion? > It also does make sense to come protected when the police use dangerous weapons and violent strategies against protests. That assertion makes absolutely no sense in france, specially as you're referring to one-off protests where activists plan to riot and assault people and destroy property.

boudin 6y ago
https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_polici%C3%A8re_en_France https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_polici%C3%A8re_en_F... There is plenty of journalist who did a good job to report violence also. You can look for articles in 2018 and 2019 mainly. > That assertion makes absolutely no sense in france, specially as you're referring to one-off protests where activists plan to riot and assault people and destroy property. You don't know much about what has been happening in France apparently. I'm not talking about the actions of far-right parties to discredit protests or the few people that joins protests just for the fight but people who are protesting in the first place.

raverbashing 6y ago

Good luck trying to convince anyone with such a crap argument. At this point I cannot distinguish the GJ from a crying kid on a plane that's crying just because and the more they scream the more it hurts their throat making them scream more. The protestors are exposing themselves to be the chair à canon of political movements (which might or might not have ulterior motives)