4 ms·
That contradicts with the article. The article states that the Muslim scholar theorized that god actively mutates the animals that want to adapt, i.e. god didn'
by eska 6y ago
That contradicts with the article. The article states that the Muslim scholar theorized that god actively mutates the animals that want to adapt, i.e. god didn't just invent "the mechanism" of mutation, as you say.
- pvaldes 6y ago> Muslim scholar theorized that god actively mutates the animals that want to adapt, This theory is a pastiche trying to use the "good parts" from Darwinism and is clearly worse than the original Anybody claiming this, just don't have a deep understanding of mutations. Mutations are not a god's gift. Maths and science predict that they happen randomly, and most of the time they carry terrible consequences. Lets take for example the people that inherited the butterfly skin syndrome. With a so fragile skin that it rips from the shoulder to the waistline at the minimum brush. Do this girl or this boy wanted to "adapt" to have a insufferable pain all the days of this life? I seriously doubt that anybody would have asked for that. Lets be serious.
- throwaway123x2 6y agoI mean it predated Darwin by a lot, we shouldn't be surprised it has its faults.
- rtkwe 6y agoI was talking in a more general sense not about the specific mechanism in the article, more about the general way science and religion can at least coexist somewhat coherently which is something a lot of online athiests perplexed by.