4 ms·
In SeaweedFS both metadata and data are portable. You can move metadata to any faster scalable data store. And/or move the data to any cheaper/faster/larger st
by chrislusf 6y ago
In SeaweedFS both metadata and data are portable.
You can move metadata to any faster scalable data store. And/or move the data to any cheaper/faster/larger storage, in cloud or in your garage.
- gbrits 6y agoCurrently using Minio which is a relative success. However as part of quality checks we're using a lot 'listObjectsV2' S3-calls to check for gaps in our data, which is pretty slow. When using SeadweedFS plus, say, a Filer meta-data store based on Redis, this would presumably be faster?
- chrislusf 6y agoOf course you can go with faster filer stores. Default filer store would be enough for millions of files. It is the same speed as a common file listing. Actually I do not understand why MinIO is slow here.
- 3np 6y agoSure. Not really saying one is better than the other; SeaweedFS approach allows you flexibility with these decisions and offloading, GlusterFS has no dependencies on additional services to reach its full potential.