3 ms·
When you say scaling and then mention 'silver and palladium' in the same text I can not take you seriously. No large industrial process to solve a global scalin
by nickik 6y ago
When you say scaling and then mention 'silver and palladium' in the same text I can not take you seriously. No large industrial process to solve a global scaling problem can use even 1g of such metals.
There is a reason tons and tons of money in battery research is spent on removing every single metal that is even remotely expensive. Cobalt is being cut out. Gravity is on the getting cut soon. Once those are achieved the nickel will be replaced with sulfur. Once we have sulfur-silicon batteries the material cost of the battery will be incredibly low and will TWh factories the marginal production cost per battery will also be incredibly low.
Why should we spend lots of time and resources on a technology that has so many issues, when we already have a working much better solution, with much better prospect of being much better over time. In fact, in those technologies there is already a cost-curve happening right now that makes it cheaper every year and there is no reason why it should stop now.
- aurizon 6y agoA lot of palladium and platinum is completely consumed in catalytic converters in IC exhausts - scattered as dust. As IC declines, this will be freed. road-dust in places might be worth gathering?? In addition, the membranes will be in large facilities and are not consumed, although they need to be melted and made anew as sites get poisoned. I see batteries as the winners, with hydrogen as a niche - that said, even a niche is large on the global scale and once optimised, will be part of the overall process whereby we get rid of all IC engines