5 ms·
Couldn't much of this be scaled back if we removed some of the layers and intermediaries? If we had a single state-run bank (even if it were just as the fulfil
by hakfoo 6y ago
Couldn't much of this be scaled back if we removed some of the layers and intermediaries?
If we had a single state-run bank (even if it were just as the fulfillment "back end" behind different consumer-facing servicing organizations), then a transfer would occur on a single ledger in a matter of milliseconds, rather than waiting for the East Podunk Bank, Trust, and Pork Cannery to pull a batched update file over a T-1 they put in in the first Bush administration.
Fraud could be handled better than it is now. We have terrible security/convenience compromises (Chip + Signature, anyone?) and when we try to improve matters (3-D Secure) it is presented so badly and clumsily that it basically dies on arrival (it's coming back, but mostly because the EU is cramming it down people's throats)
Chargebacks are a weird case. It feels like they come from two places-- either as the first response to a fraudulent transaction, or as an escalation for when there's no other way to get satisfaction. If you're fair with your refund policy, your chargeback rate should be close to nil.
- reader_mode 6y agoYour basic assumption is that you only have one government involved - and that's ignoring all the technical issues.