3 ms·
How about this: colleges are seen as places of socioeconomic mobility rather than means of protecting existing stature? Eliminate legacy admissions and make ev
by iaw 6y ago
How about this: colleges are seen as places of socioeconomic mobility rather than means of protecting existing stature?
Eliminate legacy admissions and make everything race blind but incorporate a generational wealth score. The result for certain groups will likely be the same but the explanation becomes clearer.
We can't talk about this issue without looking at the disparity between Asian Americans and African Americans with the former making almost 2x as much as the latter [0] on median in 2010. If we focus on generational wealth groups of students with large real estate, business, and financial holdings would be penalized and a rich African American or poor Asian Americans wont slip through the cracks due to their race.
We're past the point where admission can be based solely on merit because if they let in everyone with enough merit the school couldn't handle it. So we have to start looking into the circumstances under which that merit was accomplished, e.g. were they affluent and with greater resources than their impoverished counterparts?
[0] https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/06/19/the-rise-of-asian-americans/ https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/06/19/the-rise-of-asian...
- jakelazaroff 6y ago> Eliminate legacy admissions and make everything race blind but incorporate a generational wealth score. You know, that's a really interesting idea. Sounds similar to Kapor Capital's "distance traveled" metric they use when hiring — basically, what were the candidate's circumstances and how hard did they have to work for their accomplishments. https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/02/kapors-2/ https://techcrunch.com/2015/04/02/kapors-2/
- iaw 6y agoWow, I like that article. This line really struck me as an excellent point: "...if you believe you’re a meritocracy and you have numbers like everybody who has released their data, the implicit message is that Caucasian men are better than everyone else. Because that’s who is overrepresented. It’s endorsing a notion that these other people aren’t as good, and therefore that’s why there aren’t a ton of them."