3 ms·
I have found Linode disks to have the best performance in all http://pastebin.ca/2049137 http://pastebin.ca/2049137 You are correct, I/O is the challenge in a
by jsprinkles 16y ago
I have found Linode disks to have the best performance in all
http://pastebin.ca/2049137 http://pastebin.ca/2049137
You are correct, I/O is the challenge in administering systems in a virtual environment. My database which does not fit in memory does fine on a high-load site because I cache it responsibly. For comparison, here are awful results from a new player called ChunkHost, who I signed up for with the purpose of testing
http://pastebin.ca/2049142 http://pastebin.ca/2049142
The sequential write throughput there is troubling. This comparison from a couple years back is interesting too
http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-performance-comparison/ http://journal.uggedal.com/vps-performance-comparison/
I've linked this URL before but it really does the best of breaking it down. What cloud providers have you tried? In my experience there are vast gaps between certain ones, Amazon no exception. Hard to stereotype cloud with gaps like those.
Even if SoftLayer could provision me a new box in ten minutes the improvement to my sleep from not waking up for every disk failure and submitting a remote hands ticket at who knows how much per pop far outweighs anything else.
- whakojacko 16y agoI have also had good experience with linode performance (just a small instance I use for a few personal projects). However, AFAIK linode is just using local on-box disk, which is a whole different animal from EBS.