3 ms·
Although everyone is saying that Intel is dead in single thread (which is definitely far more true than previously), I don't see 5.4GHz as infeasible for them -
by Jap2-0 6y ago
Although everyone is saying that Intel is dead in single thread (which is definitely far more true than previously), I don't see 5.4GHz as infeasible for them - tenth gen goes up to 5.3GHz at the very high end and I would be surprised if they didn't reach at least 5.4GHz.
Looking historically, the 6700k reached 4.2GHz, the 7700k 4.5GHz, the 8700k 4.7GHz, the 9900k 5.0GHz, and the 10900k 5.3GHz - which would imply 5.5 or 5.6GHz for what will (presumably) be the 11900k.
- effie 6y agoPower consumption will probably curb that frequency hike above 5GHz.
- Jap2-0 6y agoHaven't people been saying that for a long time?
- read_if_gay_ 6y agoWe've also been stuck at ~4GHz for a long time. The 10th gen Core only manages more because of their ridiculous 300W power consumption.
- systemvoltage 6y agoEveryone here is missing the most important concept in semiconductor manufacturing: binning and yield [1]. They're interconnected. It's not like Intel can make 5.4 GHz chips for days on. It doesn't work that way. Ofcourse they can manufacture processors capable of some ridiculous 6.0 GHz (not accounting for power consumption)... but that would be 0.1% yield. You cannot run a factory like this. [1] https://www.techspot.com/article/2039-chip-binning/ https://www.techspot.com/article/2039-chip-binning/