4 ms·
I think OP's main argument is that if you actually need a lot of cores, then you should probably be offloading some of that work onto a server. I currently use
by lliamander 6y ago
I think OP's main argument is that if you actually need a lot of cores, then you should probably be offloading some of that work onto a server.
I currently use a 6-core mobile H-class CPU for my work that is a mix of Java and JS development, with a bunch of browser tabs and docker containers running, large IntelliJ project, etc. While my system often has a lot of processes/threads running, the main cost of those is in memory utilization rather than constant CPU performance.
I'm not saying that can't use more CPU horsepower, but it's certainly enough for my needs (for now). The main benefit of having more cores for me right now is just to maintain system responsiveness while running a bunch of background tasks, rather than raw throughput of large compile jobs.
- tmd83 6y agoKind of the same setup for me. Primarily Java work on a 6 core laptop. Between Chrome absurd RAM/cpu usage, IntelliJ, Gradle, Weblogic memory usage is just super high and cpu is not so little either at times even without build. Add anything extra I'm running for diagnostic, performance tuning and things are very troublesome. And Mac doesn't seem to handle such pressure as gracefully as Linux (though I'm not 100% sure).
- lliamander 6y agoI'm running Linux and things generally feel pretty smooth to me. It wouldn't surprise me if Linux had better multi-tasking support.
- tmd83 6y agoI think more than better multi tasking it's handling of load when things are at the limit in some fashion whether is excessive cpu or ram.