3 ms·
Interesting quote from the abstract: > ...the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak.
by ColanR 6y ago
Interesting quote from the abstract:
> ...the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak....Here, however, we use in-depth analyses of the available data and literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist in nature and their sequences have been fabricated. In addition, we also offer our insights on the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated naturally from a coronavirus that infected the Mojiang miners.
- dfischer 6y ago> Since its publication, the RaTG13 virus has served as the founding evidence for the theory that SARS-CoV-2 must have a natural origin. However, no live virus or an intact genome of RaTG13 have ever been isolated or recovered. Therefore, the only proof for the “existence” of RaTG13 in nature is its genomic sequence published on GenBank.