3 ms·
Oh man, it's actually a real improvement! I was afraid it was more pop sci, but not this is pretty cool. I think this is the paper? https://arxiv.org/abs/2007
by Tyr42 6y ago
Oh man, it's actually a real improvement! I was afraid it was more pop sci, but not this is pretty cool.
I think this is the paper?
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01409 https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01409
- ebg13 6y agoHeh. For some definitions of "real". > they were only able to subtract 0.2 billionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a percent.
- np_tedious 6y agoLooks like a real number to me
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- DudeInBasement 6y agoMy double won't notice the difference
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- tuxone 6y agoYea but just rational