The police would very much enforce them, they aren't in charge of what is constitutional or not, unless your police is incompetent. What you'd rather want to s

The police would very much enforce them, they aren't in charge of what is constitutional or not, unless your police is incompetent. What you'd rather want to say is "they are thrown out in court". >It is simply not the case in the us that the legislature passing a law against speech means that the speech is unprotected and illegal. Until a court considers otherwise, it very much is. A law is valid until a court overthrows it. Hence it requires proper police (the executive) to enforce it. Otherwise the state will just not function.