3 ms·
Given the pervasive commercial surveillance system, a user needs to have several protective layers just to browse the WWW: a browser with security extensions (
by heresie-dabord 6y ago
Given the pervasive commercial surveillance system, a user needs to have several protective layers just to browse the WWW:
a browser with security extensions (although a good browser should be built with security as a design principle, not as an "add-on")
ESNI and DoH (even though Cloudflare can see the aggregate)
DNS caching and blocking in the subnet
iptables/nftables blocking of undesirable IP address ranges by the router
edit: It's safer to leave the dysfunctional WWW alone and use only RSS.
- Pet_Ant 6y ago> It's safer to leave the dysfunctional WWW alone and use only RSS. Is their any evidence that Google killed Google Reader because it interfered with their Ad/user-tracking metrics business?
- tremon 6y agoDisagree on DoH though, because it defeats DNS caching and blocking in the subnet. Plus, many people trust their own provider more than yet another US corporation.
- tptacek 6y agoIt defeats DNS caching and blocking in the "subnet" because for most US users the DNS provider is an adversary, and trusting it would be a mistake.
- sildur 6y agoBut there is an entire world outside the US. I trust my local ISP way more than a US corporation.
- tptacek 6y agoThat's fascinating, but now you know why people in the US are quick to embrace DoH in its default configurations. And, of course, nothing ties DoH to major US corporations. You can DoH to a NUC in your cousin's bedroom closet.
- SAI_Peregrinus 6y agoI run DoH on a raspberry Pi with piHole. And then DoH from it to Quad9's servers. DNS blocking, with DoH.
- judge2020 6y agoThey're all only useful in certain circumstances.