> We know for a fact all the major news outlets edit photos, often don’t use their own reporters, write sensational articles (actively stretching facts). We ca

> We know for a fact all the major news outlets edit photos, often don’t use their own reporters, write sensational articles (actively stretching facts). We can't, perhaps, for a definition that captures all sketchy sources, but we can come up with a reasonable definition that encapsulates some of them. > I think it’s short sighted to try and suppress. Why? Suppressing the mass, unencumbered spread of vexatious lies as "news" would seem to be beneficial to all.