3 ms·
It's, also, important to keep in mind that Influenza has a vaccination, which is very cheap and many elderly people take it. Yet, many die from it (and it doesn
by WinstonSmith84 6y ago
It's, also, important to keep in mind that Influenza has a vaccination, which is very cheap and many elderly people take it. Yet, many die from it (and it doesn't make any headlines).
We are at the end just comparing apples to oranges. It would be really interesting to make such comparisons if we hadn't any vaccination for Influenza.
- dustinmoris 6y agoAlso Influenza is not a novel virus, so if 40k people die of Influenza this year, doesn't mean that it couldn't have killed more people, because in fact, there was another 40k who died the year before and therefore don't die again, and another 40k who died 2 years ago, etc. Basically Influenza is endemic and the deaths are evenly distributed over long periods of time, whereas a novel virus will obviously have a huge initial death count in year 1, but subsequent years will see equally many less deaths logically.
- funcDropShadow 6y agoYou can approximate the effect of a new Influenza without vaccines if you look at the numbers for the year 1918. That definitely made headlines (In this special case that is an interesting story by itself). But the effect influenza had in 1918 is not comparable to the normal flu. So if people insist that Covid-19 is just like the flu, agree with them and remind them of a new flu without vaccines, just like the Spanish Flu.