3 ms·
Their motivation is silly: > The world is better off when families can spend more time together Yeah, almost no families in the world have the money to fly an
by einpoklum 6y ago
Their motivation is silly:
> The world is better off when families can spend more time together
Yeah, almost no families in the world have the money to fly anywhere business class, in their life, ever. More importantly, it's ridiculous to rely on flight as part of the daily routine of a family - for multiple reasons, not the least of which being the environmental one.
> businesses have more opportunities to succeed in our global economy
This is the actual motivation, I would think.
> and world leaders can foster greater understanding in person.
Well, this point itself is debatable, especially considering certain current world leaders, but basically it's the same as the previous pont.
So the motivation is: "Let rich/powerful organizations ferry important people around faster to further their interests." Not so romantic, but it's a legitimate reason to work on a high-end product or service, I guess.
- nickpp 6y agoCarriers when first cell phone appeared: "Families can communicate more" You: "No family can afford it" Countless services we take today for granted have been introduced initially as toys for the ultra rich, then made their way to the general consumer. It's a good thing.
- einpoklum 6y agoFalse analogy. Mobile phones were expensive because the R&D was expensive and the production technology immature. Flying people requires a lot of energy because of physical constraints, and the potential economies on fuel use, while existent, are strongly constrained.
- nickpp 6y agoExtracting and storing energy from nature is also a technological problem. Also solved using R&D.