3 ms·

Try searching "optics Haskell" https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=mL5-X7iCJNCs0PEPo9aJ4Ak&q=optics+haskell&oq=optics+haskell&gs_lcp=ChFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXd

Try searching "optics Haskell" https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=mL5-X7iCJNCs0PEPo9aJ4Ak&q=optics+haskell&oq=optics+haskell&gs_lcp=ChFtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1ocBADMgUIABDJAzIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeOgIIKToFCAAQsQM6AggAOggIABCxAxCDAToFCC4QsQM6CAgAELEDEMkDOgUIABCSAzoCCC5QvjVYwUVg4EdoDnAAeACAAQCIAQCSAQCYAQCgAQGwAQ8&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-hp https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=mL5-X7iCJNCs0PEPo... First result is to the popular and well-documented `optics` library which is exactly this topic. It's perfectly discoverable. On that note, try googling "Haskell >>=" or "Haskell <$>". Good results for both. Looks like the "Haskell's symbols and esoterica isn't googlable" is a dead argument now :)

tome 6y ago
> On that note, try googling "Haskell >>=" or "Haskell <$>". Good results for both. Looks like the "Haskell's symbols and esoterica isn't googlable" is a dead argument now :) Wow, it works! I wonder when this happened.