3 ms·
A better solution is to have an even number of people, but have a tie-breaker vote token that is passed around between everyone in round-robin fashion. In the
by d_silin 6y ago
A better solution is to have an even number of people, but have a tie-breaker vote token that is passed around between everyone in round-robin fashion.
In the event of the tie, the tie-breaker vote owner resolves it and passes the to token to the next person.
In this manner, the decision bias is averaged out between all of the board members.
- zaarn 6y agoAnd how exactly is that worse than an uneven number of people? If there is an uneven number of people there is no bias of a tie breaker to balance out.
- gostsamo 6y agoWhoever schedules the agenda can game the system by arranging the token to be in a preferred holder when there is a important decision to be made. Might happen ones in ten years, but bitterness does not have half-life.