> I'm surprised how different this is from all the secondary information out there, but ok, you're right. The secondary information is more useful in practice,

> I'm surprised how different this is from all the secondary information out there, but ok, you're right. The secondary information is more useful in practice, because it represents the actual practice, not legal theory. > I said "could ever not", not "could not ever", but that's a moot point now. Ah, sorry, I misread, it's my bad.