3 ms·
It's unclear to me why twitter was protecting this persons identity to begin with. They have no obligation to do so and this persons actions were dishonest, an
by nullc 6y ago
It's unclear to me why twitter was protecting this persons identity to begin with.
They have no obligation to do so and this persons actions were dishonest, anti-social, and likely unlawful.
- creato 6y agoIf twitter didn't stand up for their dishonest users, a whole lot of the outrage bait they depend on to keep people glued to their twitter feeds might disappear.
- sjy 6y agoFrom the article: “Twitter's primary goal is to ensure that the subpoena not be used to chill anonymous speech that does not rise to the level of defamation.”
- LatteLazy 6y agoThe same reason you get a lawyer and a trial even if you look guilty.
- formerly_proven 6y agoBecause twitter is a court of law...?