> This suggests to me that they're more in favor of Google's position, and are querying how to arrive at that decision from a legal basis. I wouldn't read that

> This suggests to me that they're more in favor of Google's position, and are querying how to arrive at that decision from a legal basis. I wouldn't read that much into it. Google has made the argument that "this means doom-and-gloom" and Oracle that "this is technically illegal". It makes sense that they're interrogating the parties along the lines of the arguments that have been presented. I wouldn't say it's a signal that they favor one over the other.