2 ms·
Yeah, but so what? Don't most organization have rules designed to allow them to function as an organization or solve specific problems they encounter? It's no
by ardy42 6y ago
Yeah, but so what? Don't most organization have rules designed to allow them to function as an organization or solve specific problems they encounter? It's not like an Apple employee can freely blog about the unreleased product they're working on or simultaneously work with Samsung on a competing product.
- solidasparagus 6y agoYeah. And the SAG rules aren't unreasonable IMO. But a union is not replacing the existing rules of your workplace, it's a second group of people who can add rules.
- ardy42 6y ago> Yeah. And the SAG rules aren't unreasonable IMO. But a union is not replacing the existing rules of your workplace, it's a second group of people who can add rules. Yes and no. 1) Rules aren't interchangeable, undifferentiated things. An employer's rules are meant to mostly benefit the employer. Rules a union adds would be to mostly benefit its members. 2) A union can get employer workplace rules changed in its negotiations, if its members objected to them and they have enough negotiating power. 3) That "second group of people" could possible include you as a union member, and if it doesn't, it's a group you would have far more influence over than company management.