4 ms·

And still less than apple's $1000 stand, I don't know how they do it! Jokes aside, it's very impressive.

• deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
• Polylactic_acid 6y ago
  If you look at the monitor + stand its actually cheaper than competing pro monitors. I have no idea why they didn't just make the monitor more expensive and the stand cheaper and include vesa holes to avoid the years of jokes that followed that stand.
  • jsjohnst 6y ago
    > its actually cheaper than competing pro monitors I mostly agree with you, but Dell has an 8K monitor (albeit fugly in comparison) for around $3500 including stand (if memory serves).
    • Polylactic_acid 6y ago
      Was that dell monitor calibrated and rated for professional usage? I don't use this stuff but apparently most of the cost is making sure the screen perfectly replicates colors and not just being high resolution.
      • ancientworldnow 6y ago
        I use professional monitors in color critical environments and we've tested the apple monitor and it absolutely is not appropriate for professional usage despite their claims to the contrary. We're using Sony, Flan fees Scientific, and Dolby and the Apple isn't even close.
        • aikinai 6y ago
          Posted above as well, but this incredibly detailed review agrees with you. https://youtu.be/rtd7UzLJHrU https://youtu.be/rtd7UzLJHrU
  • kinkrtyavimoodh 6y ago
    Because it gives them free publicity and bolsters the 'luxury' perception of their brand.
  • aikinai 6y ago
    That was their story, but apparently it can’t actually compete with pro monitors. https://youtu.be/rtd7UzLJHrU https://youtu.be/rtd7UzLJHrU