3 ms·
It has to do with men who have the ability to over-indulge or be lazy (and get fat) but have the strength to avoid such activities. Physical strength is not a
by SHOwnsYou 15y ago
It has to do with men who have the ability to over-indulge or be lazy (and get fat) but have the strength to avoid such activities.
Physical strength is not a factor in this. It is strength of the mind.
- mikecane 15y ago>>>men who have the ability to over-indulge or be lazy (and get fat) No. Not everyone can get fat. I know this. I'm one of them. And yes, Caesars throughout history should fear people like me. Because we're gunning for their pompous, smug, fat, lazy asses. Aside from their flabby souls, their physicality aesthetically disgusts us,
- cullend 15y agoShut up you idiot. First, you're missing more than half the point and im not going to explain. Reread 3 times then try again. Speaking to your personal anecdote you view as fact, Or your metabolism has just been good with whatever you've thrown at it, and you've never put it into a state of shock to cause one of the many means of retention. Alternatively you can go with, CALORIES IN CALORIES OUT. CANT EXPLAIN THAT.
- sorbus 15y agoYou may want to look at the guidelines again. The relevant one in this case is "When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. E.g. "That is an idiotic thing to say; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3.""
- mikecane 15y agoI see I touched a nerve here. Apologies to anyone who took offense. I meant it in a Seven Deadly Sins sense, although the heat I put into the comment made it seem like I even hated Santa Claus!