4 ms·
Pretty interesting article. Apologies for going off topic. I choose not to have Adobe flash installed at all. Yes, this can be a hard road on the Internet, but
by trotsky 15y ago
Pretty interesting article. Apologies for going off topic.
I choose not to have Adobe flash installed at all. Yes, this can be a hard road on the Internet, but I think recent flash 0days at least give some weight to the approach.
One bright spot in an otherwise plugin filled world is youtube. I use chrome, an html5 video compliant browser, and youtube lets me opt in to their html5 trial.
Most of the time, this works great. The videos look good, stream well, no problem. But sometimes, like in the case of this friday video youtube insists that I need the flash plugin. Why? It's not that it isn't encoded correctly - as far as I know it's that it has an ad. And google has decided it'd be too easy to skip the ad with html5 or it can't play it so it just doesn't let me watch it. Of course, if I can't watch the video I'm not seeing the ad anyway.
Here is the kicker though. To watch the video I picked up my phone and opened the youtube application. I don't have flash installed on my phone either, but the youtube app is happy to just play the basic h.264. The kicker? Well, youtube didn't show me an ad there either.
Sorry for the rant. Is youtube ever going to start treating their html5 video as a first class citizen?