4 ms·
I think we're in agreement. What I meant by no practical implication was that if I'm an atheist and then I learn that there is in fact a God, but he's either to
by names_are_hard 6y ago
I think we're in agreement. What I meant by no practical implication was that if I'm an atheist and then I learn that there is in fact a God, but he's either too busy, limited, or otherwise uninterested in my life, then I can shrug off that information with no negative consequences. It doesn't matter to me if there's no God or if there's an uninvolved God, except as an academic question (ie no practical implication).
But if I'm an atheist and I learn that there's a God that cares about me or my behavior then I will likely have to change my lifestyle. Maybe I'll have to start praying, or giving charity, or stop stealing, or start dancing around a fire now and then so that the rain comes, or marry in a certain way, etc.
It's no surprise to me that the popular versions of God-belief out there describe a God that's very involved in Earthly affairs. Because otherwise, what's the point?
- frosted-flakes 6y agoMany or most religions are concerned with what comes after life. To many people, that is the point.
- names_are_hard 6y agoExactly. To my knowledge most religions teach that what comes after life depends, at least in part, in what we do during our lives. In other words, God is concerned with us and how we live on Earth. Which is remarkable, given how large the universe is and how apparently insignificant we are.
- frosted-flakes 6y agoWhy is it remarkable? The point is that (in Christianity), God is all-knowing, and doesn't suffer from the same limitations as humans, or ants.