3 ms·
Just repeating my comment here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24637140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24637140 although it was Tridactyl vs QuteBrow
by RMPR 6y ago
Just repeating my comment here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24637140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24637140 although it was Tridactyl vs QuteBrowser, the same applies. Before tridactyl, I used vimium and vim-vixen, this is the best one hands down. In terms of integration with Firefox and links recognition. For the hints, it's mainly the fact that tridactyl highlights the elements hinted, for example with the Twitter web UI:
tridactyl: https://imgur.com/D1PDBgY https://imgur.com/D1PDBgY
qutebrowser: https://imgur.com/m4vtbk0 https://imgur.com/m4vtbk0
Now it's not that a big deal, but the advantages appears clearly on more saturated pages, off the top of my head, stackoverflow's triage:
With qutebrowser[0], if I want to close the modal, `gs` and `hd` are almost on the same place (it's only with experience that I noticed that hints are top left so `hd` is the hint I'm looking for) compare this to tridactyl[1] the `hy` fits very nicely with the highlight which doesn't let any place for ambiguity. I noticed your other answer about the addons, it's very much appreciated, and if I can help with the beta or whatever, let me know, keep up with the great work.
0: https://imgur.com/H4oGufK https://imgur.com/H4oGufK
1: https://imgur.com/NyNyOoX https://imgur.com/NyNyOoX
- wyclif 6y agoThanks, I ask because currently I'm using Tridactyl on Firefox but Vimium on Chrome, and it's interesting to compare the two approaches to the same problems.