4 ms·

K-12 schooling in America is paid through property taxes, so unless they are living in a area with high property taxes you most likely wont be helping much. Co

K-12 schooling in America is paid through property taxes, so unless they are living in a area with high property taxes you most likely wont be helping much. College level school funding (state/federal) has basically dried up in the past few decades with budget cuts. The idea is affordable public college education is not realistic for most people. I believe this is what the commenter is talking about needing more funding.

dragonwriter 6y ago
> K-12 schooling in America is paid through property taxes. That’s probably not true exclusively anywhere in America, and it's not true predominantly in a number of parts of America. For instance, in California less than 1/4 comes of K-12 funding comes from local property taxes, and the absolute majority comes from State funds which are derived primarily from state income taxes.
barry-cotter 6y ago
> The combination of state, local, and federal school funding makes it so that the districts attended by poor students are funded 2.5% more than non-poor students. And even within districts, “schools with less advantaged students spend at least as much (and often significantly more).” ... > Property based funding of schools is not likely to be a very effective target for school reform since our current system does not actually have large differences in the funding of poor students. I think that it is more likely that the dysfunction in the schools is best explained by a lack of continuity and efficiency within the schools that serve poor students. The property tax debate is mostly just an easy but misguided target for explaining the achievement gap. On top of the pure fact that property based taxes have actually still allowed for the progressive funding of schools, we already have examples of states that fund students without a total reliance on local property taxes. Take Michigan. Michigan has a centralized funding source for their students. The state takes an overall tax and then breaks it up evenly across students within the state (there are extra complexities to this that are addressed in this article). Even with these changes in school funding, it does not appear that the reformed funding strategy had any impact on student outcomes. In general, funding is not a good proxy for educational quality. https://medium.com/@coreykeyser/why-conventional-wisdom-on-education-reform-is-wrong-a-primer-f6c0361a48d1 https://medium.com/@coreykeyser/why-conventional-wisdom-on-e...

dragonwriter 6y ago

> K-12 schooling in America is paid through property taxes. That’s probably not true exclusively anywhere in America, and it's not true predominantly in a number of parts of America. For instance, in California less than 1/4 comes of K-12 funding comes from local property taxes, and the absolute majority comes from State funds which are derived primarily from state income taxes.

barry-cotter 6y ago

> The combination of state, local, and federal school funding makes it so that the districts attended by poor students are funded 2.5% more than non-poor students. And even within districts, “schools with less advantaged students spend at least as much (and often significantly more).” ... > Property based funding of schools is not likely to be a very effective target for school reform since our current system does not actually have large differences in the funding of poor students. I think that it is more likely that the dysfunction in the schools is best explained by a lack of continuity and efficiency within the schools that serve poor students. The property tax debate is mostly just an easy but misguided target for explaining the achievement gap. On top of the pure fact that property based taxes have actually still allowed for the progressive funding of schools, we already have examples of states that fund students without a total reliance on local property taxes. Take Michigan. Michigan has a centralized funding source for their students. The state takes an overall tax and then breaks it up evenly across students within the state (there are extra complexities to this that are addressed in this article). Even with these changes in school funding, it does not appear that the reformed funding strategy had any impact on student outcomes. In general, funding is not a good proxy for educational quality. https://medium.com/@coreykeyser/why-conventional-wisdom-on-education-reform-is-wrong-a-primer-f6c0361a48d1 https://medium.com/@coreykeyser/why-conventional-wisdom-on-e...