4 ms·
I really, really want to like this move. I've written on HN before that the Trump admin's revealed immigration preference is, in effect, "as few immigrants as
by curiousllama 6y ago
I really, really want to like this move.
I've written on HN before that the Trump admin's revealed immigration preference is, in effect, "as few immigrants as possible" [1]. Every past move this administration has made with regard to visas has been ill-advised and badly executed (imo). That they solved problem 1 (ill-advised) does not mean they've solved problem 2 (badly executed).
In that light, I can't help but think this is just another RFE hole: "you studied math and cs, and now want to work as a data scientist? That's not closely enough related" or "quantitative economics is not STEM, even though 12/15 required courses were math, stats, and CS, and we previously approved the program" (both objections I've heard raised in the past year, _before_ this new emphasis on degree-job relatedness).
This isn't a bad policy - it may be good, even! - but I hope it gets implemented by the next administration.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23760337 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23760337
- 908B64B197 6y ago> "you studied math and cs, and now want to work as a data scientist? That's not closely enough related" This could be trivially avoided by simply aggregating the job posting requirements for similar positions or doing any sort of survey of the qualifications and education of currently employed highly paid data scientists.
- curiousllama 6y agoYea, it could. A similar argument got rejected. That’s the problem.