3 ms·
Follows it in time only. MS today is not because of the stagnated Microsoft, but in spite of it. Nadella saved MS. You are committing fallacies of conflating c
by seg_lol 6y ago
Follows it in time only. MS today is not because of the stagnated Microsoft, but in spite of it. Nadella saved MS.
You are committing fallacies of conflating cause and effect and surviorship bias.
- shadowgovt 6y agoYou claim MS "should have been replanted" in the '90s, but that claim makes the assumption that the end-result would be better than what we have now, does it not? I don't think that's a safe assumption.