3 ms·

I’ve heard that CC0 is better for content than code (though I can’t remember exactly why). Either way, I wish the Unlicense and WTFPL people would get over them

I’ve heard that CC0 is better for content than code (though I can’t remember exactly why). Either way, I wish the Unlicense and WTFPL people would get over themselves and just go with MIT: a license that I think they would use if it was called the “Do-What-You-Want-Just-Don’t-Sue-Me” License.

legulere 6y ago
Creative Commons generally is better for content than for code. CC0 is an exception. It tries to put something into public domain and where that is not possible tries to grant the same rights.