There is a lot to unpack here, but I think it needs to be addressed since your comment is getting so much exposure. >> They ultimately controlled where those p

There is a lot to unpack here, but I think it needs to be addressed since your comment is getting so much exposure. >> They ultimately controlled where those people worked This is entire point of the anti-solicitation agreement. I don't need to cite anything. Read the transcripts from Jobs and tell me again how it was to protect you from recruiters. How did you get sufficient protection after they lost the suit? The point is showing the behavior of large companies that wield too much power and control large portions of the market, either from the customer's standpoint or the employees. They stopped their behavior only after being sued by the employees, who gained very little, the lawyers won and the GAFS ultimately profited from this endeavor. Microsoft today is immaterial to the MS that should have been replanted in the 90s. Does not follow. BTW it is hard to respond when your post is continually ninja-edited.