4 ms·
We certainly took a lot of inspiration and leaned on the awesome experience of the nanobox team, but this is largely a completely different architecture.
by phildougherty 6y ago
We certainly took a lot of inspiration and leaned on the awesome experience of the nanobox team, but this is largely a completely different architecture.
- sciurus 6y agoCan you tell us anything about the architecture?
- phildougherty 6y agoWe will be revealing a lot more about the architecture at our upcoming virtual conference called Deploy that is happening Nov 10-11th. There are a few sessions that touch on how the platform was implemented and I encourage you to tune in for those! (schedule to be announced soon). https://www.digitalocean.com/deploy/ https://www.digitalocean.com/deploy/
- alexellisuk 6y agoThis is what I found out by printing the environment variables: https://twitter.com/alexellisuk/status/1306343018488791040 https://twitter.com/alexellisuk/status/1306343018488791040
- Existenceblinks 6y agoWasn't the Appsail nanobox? IIRC, it was planed to be DO's PaaS, so it's cancelled and then DO's PaaS is based on k8s instead?
- dubcanada 6y agoAppsail was nanobox from what I saw, they redid it between appsail and "apps".
- Existenceblinks 6y agoIf Appsail was cancelled, what's the point of nanobox acquiring .. I wonder?
- dubcanada 6y agoMaybe an acquihire? I don't recall seeing any of the nanobox people even mentioned or reply in any of the slack messages. So I am not really sure.